Ballot Measures
Remcho, Johansen & Purcell has been
extensively involved in state and local ballot measures, referenda,
and recalls. The firm has drafted numerous initiatives and advised
numerous ballot measure committees. The firm also has extensive
experience in ballot measure litigation, including pre-election and
post-election challenges and litigation over the form and content of
petitions and ballot arguments. The firm has both defended and
challenged ballot measures in state and federal courts.
The firm has represented the California Teachers Association and
others on a number of ballot measures relating to education,
including opposing two statewide initiatives that would have
instituted a private school voucher system in the state of
California. The firm has
also drafted legislation, including initiatives, regarding school funding, charter schools,
and stem cell research. The firm has also been involved in numerous
referenda campaigns and several recall efforts.
A representative and partial list of recent initiative,
referenda and recalls in which the firm has been involved is included
below:
2003-04:
Proposition 56
(March 2004 Statewide Ballot). The Budget
Accountability Act.
Senate Bill 2, challenge to
referendum regarding employee health coverage.
The California Stem Cell Research and Cures Act.
Litigation regarding the 2003
gubernatorial recall, on behalf of Governor Gray Davis.
The Improving Classroom Education Act.
Car Buyers’ Bill of Rights Act.
2002:
Referendum regarding Interim
Contract for Waste Disposal (Town of San Anselmo).
Measure W, Orange County ("The Orange County Central Park and Nature
Preserve Initiative").
Workers’ Compensation Initiatives.
2000:
Proposition 39 (Majority Vote for School Bonds).
Proposition 26 (Majority Vote for School Bonds).
California Class Size Reduction Act.
Term Limits (Constitutional Amendment).
November 1998:
Proposition 10 (State and County Early Childhood Development
Programs. Additional Tobacco Surtax).
|